George Washington was chopping prices, which had uncannily materialized in the form of a dollar-sprouting cherry tree. For rebates this patriotic, he would surely re-cross the raging, ice-choked Delaware and weather the hell of Valley Forge all over again. We the people demand factory-to-dealer incentives, the founding father thought, grimly toiling in Mount Vernon's August heat. The tree creaked and fell to the earth, its crashing death-knell a catharsis in which the general formulated this profundity: he would sooner enter into a foreign alliance than pass up on deals this good.
Abraham Lincoln, physically incapable of telling a lie, had examined the self-evidently awesome figures and come away astonished; the Union had not seen a better deal in some four score and seven years. It was an emancipation of sorts, from the slavery of high interest rates. Dedicated was he to the proposition that all men are created equally keen on amazing bargains. Accompanied by the loud sproing of a Jew's harp, Lincoln's hat flew off his head as the whizzing musket ball of zero percent APR caved in the back of his skull.
Date Written: February 16, 2005 Author:qualcomm Average Vote: 4.40625
Comments:
02/23/2005Turgid (5):
02/23/2005Will Disney: Dude, this is a little dated, no? I mean, President's Day was two days ago, already.
02/23/2005scoop: Is this Earth-Lincoln, or the sentinet silicon-based Lincoln concoction conjured by the Excalbians to participate in a galactic experiment in this thing you call Good and Evil?
02/23/2005Will Disney (4): nice closer.
02/23/2005Jon Matza (4): Well done, Matza.
02/23/2005Litcube: Need I be more familiar with American history to understand this short/find this short funny?
02/23/2005Ewan Snow (5): No, litcube, you need to be more familiar with low budget local car dealership President's Day commercials.
02/23/2005Ewan Snow: President's Day Sale, that is.
02/23/2005Litcube: Ah!
02/23/2005TheBuyer (5): Second sentence cracked me up.
02/23/2005Jimson S. Sorghum (4): The last sentence is killer. Killer.
02/23/2005The Rid (4):
02/23/2005Mr. Pony (5): Almost not this, but this nonetheless.
02/23/2005Jawbreaker (4):
02/23/2005Phony Millions (4):
02/23/2005Streifenbeuteldachs (4): Enjoyable!
02/23/2005Mr. Pony: Look at all those revenge fours! qualcomm, how do you stand it?
02/23/2005anonymous: i know. i'm 100% sick of this crap.
02/23/2005John Slocum: a nice piece of work.
02/23/2005Jon Matza: Fuck, I just reread this and realized I should've indeed given it a five. Sorry about that. This is great. However I do feel "We the people demand factory-to-dealer incentives" should be in italics for sweet clarity's sake.
02/23/2005anonymous: i will murder you.
02/23/2005anonymous: disney, from here on out, if you vote or comment on any of my shorts, i'm going to 1-star one of yours. i don't care what you say, or how you vote. i am no longer interested in your opinion, and i will punish you if you subject me to it. let you other fucks take note.
02/23/2005Will Disney: okay!
02/24/2005cuntry: so well-crafted that i'm tempted to punish it for being too thoroughly thought through. but that wouldn't be right. right?
02/24/2005John Slocum (4): This is excellent, but there are a few things that stay my hand from delivering the 5-spot. There are a few things that make the first 'graf a little tricky to read, ie. what matza said about italics for the 'we the people' line. I think it should be: 'for rebates this patriotic,' also for more ease. The second 'graf is 80 times better, the first one reads a bit like acme-by-numbers. Best line: 'Dedicated was he to the proposition that all men are created equally keen on amazing bargains.' Great flow there. Fuck you, Slocum.
02/24/2005Jimson S. Sorghum: No, cuntry. Punish it. Punish away.
02/24/2005qualcomm: i think you've done enough with your revenge 4, jimson.
02/24/2005cuntry (5): 4/5 but too many 4's are not as good as this. i do however feel that there is something to be apprecviated in shorts that feel as though they came out all in one fit of manic writing rather than those that are "crafted".
02/24/2005Jimson S. Sorghum: There's something to be admired in both, doncha think, cuntry. I think I initially was disappointed with the premise, but after the third time I read it I was wishing I'd 5'd it, despite the author.
02/24/2005qualcomm: that is a horrible thing to say. now you owe me two stars, damn you. and i shall extract them!
02/24/2005Dylan Danko: I know what you mean, Jimson. I want to give this a four but I'm so tempted to two it. I better just leave it alone.
02/24/2005qualcomm: it's funny how self-righteous you are about your complete lack of objectivity.
02/24/2005Dylan Danko: Yes, it's hilarious.
02/24/2005Jimson S. Sorghum: Ah, but at least he's not self-righteous about his objectivity. His offense is way more charming.
02/24/2005qualcomm: charming. you douche.
02/24/2005Mr. Pony: cuntry, I would argue with you on your point. If anything, I think this short is good on purely technical merits--the jokes come across as carefully constructed and fully thought out. That's why I almost foured it--it hides it well, but this short has no soul.
02/24/2005qualcomm: it does too have a soul. built it myself, out of all metal parts.
02/24/2005qualcomm: by the way, pony, cuntry wasn't citing this short as an example of a vomited-out short. quite the opposite. see her initial comment for proper context.
02/24/2005Mr. Pony: I see that she agrees with me then!
02/25/2005Dylan Danko (4):
03/7/2005deliciousbrains (5):
07/12/2005scoop (4.5): Expert blend of Lincolnian cliches and blowout bonanza mill-you.